Area
|
Checklist items
|
Grading from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree)
|
Explanations (Provide explanation to justify your grading of each of the items)
|
Overall assessment of the paper
|
The background introduces a specific question and spells out objectives on the basis of a description of general and specific issues.
|
|
|
The methods section provides sufficient information on design, sampling, definitions, data collection, laboratory methods and data analysis.
|
|
|
The results section reports sound scientific data that meet the objectives. There are enough details and adequate statistical information.
|
|
|
The discussion section interprets the results to build a case on the basis of the data presented and the literature.
|
|
|
The limitations are described and analysed so that their impact on the capacity to conclude are well understood.
|
|
|
The paper suggests next steps in terms of intervention and gathering additional evidence on the basis of the evidence presented.
|
|
|
Methods
|
The design is adequate to meet the objectives.
|
|
|
The population is well defined and relevant to the objectives.
|
|
|
Definitions are specified, sound and based upon standardized criteria when available.
|
|
|
Sampling methods are statistically sound and adapted.
|
|
|
The sample size was estimated beforehand appropriately and is adequate.
|
|
|
The design is exempt from bias.
|
|
|
The data that were collected are well described and relevant.
|
|
|
The data was collected with methods ensuring sufficient quality.
|
|
|
The analysis is thought beforehand and appropriate.
|
|
|
The indicators generated are appropriate and well calculated.
|
|
|
The statistical tests are appropriate and well computed.
|
|
|
Appropriate attention has been given to human subject protection.
|
|
|
Writing
|
The content is well distributed in the relevant chapters and sections.
|
|
|
The language is simple and clear. The word count is < 3000.
|
|
|
The writing is sequential, going from one point to the next.
|
|
|
The active voice is used throughout.
|
|
|
The vocabulary is precise, consistent and standardized.
|
|
|
Tables and figures
|
There are no more than five relevant and useful tables and or figures.
|
|
|
The choice of graph or table to display information is judicious.
|
|
|
The tables are clear, exact and the totals add up.
|
|
|
The graphs are effective, appropriate, understandable and they have a low ink-to-data ratio.
|
|
|