Need help with your investigation or report writing? Ask the Expert. Free advice from the professional community.
You can't make decissions on this page's approval status because you have not the owner or an admin on this page's Group.
Editors
Original Authors
Alain Moren
Marta Valenciano
Thomas Grein
Contributors
Impact numbers are a relatively new concept. They are measures derived from case-control and cohort studies that are intended to be simple to understand and to help compare the population impact of different interventions [1] [2].
They are analogous to the concept of the number needed to treat (NNT) used in clinical medicine. This is the number of persons with a disease that, on average, must be treated in order to achieve one beneficial outcome (e.g. cure) or to prevent one adverse outcome (e.g. relapse).
The impact number reflects the number of people in each population (the whole population, the cases, all those exposed, and the exposed cases) among whom one case is attributable to the particular exposure or risk factor.
The following types of impact number are described below:
The table below shows these impact numbers calculated from the example of the study of drunk driving and automobile related deaths.
Impact measures
Abbrev.
Rate or number
Death rate in drunk drivers
Ie
150/1,000
Death rate in non-drunk drivers
Iu
14/1,000
Death rate in all drivers
Ipop
18/1,000
Attributable risk among exposed
ARe
136/1,000
Attributable fraction among exposed
AFe
0.91
Population attributable risk
ARpop
4/1,000
Population attributable fraction
AFpop
0.22
Population impact number
PIN
250
Case impact number
CIN
4.5
Exposure impact number
EIN
7.4
Exposed case impact number
ECIN
1.1
Population impact number of eliminating a risk factor
PIN-ER-t
40
This is the number in the whole population among whom one case is attributable to the exposure or risk factor. It can also signify, for a protective factor, the number in the whole population among whom one case will be prevented by the exposure or intervention.
It is equivalent to the reciprocal of the population attributable risk (ARpop).
In the example of drunk driving and driving related deaths (table - death from drunk driving) there were 4 deaths per 1,000 drivers in one year attributable to drunk driving. We thus have:
This means that, for every 250 people in Anystate, there is one driving related death attributable to drunk driving on average per year.
This is the number of people with the disease or outcome among whom one case is attributable to the exposure or risk factor. It can also signify, for a protective factor, the number of people with the disease among whom one case will be prevented by the exposure or intervention.
It is equivalent to the reciprocal of the population attributable fraction (AFpop).
In the example of drunk driving and driving related deaths (table - death from drunk driving), 22% of driving related deaths in the population could be attributed to drunk driving. We thus have:
This means that, for every 4.5 driving related deaths, one is attributable to drunk driving on average.
This is the number of people with the exposure among whom one excess case is attributable to the exposure.
It is equivalent to the reciprocal of the attributable risk in the exposed (ARe).
In the example of drunk driving and driving related deaths (table - death from speeding or drunk driving), there were 136 deaths per 1,000 drunk drivers in one year attributable to drunk driving. We thus have:
This means that, for every 7.4 drunk drivers, there is one driving related death attributable to drunk driving on average per year.
This is the number of exposed cases among whom one case is attributable to the exposure.
It is equivalent to the reciprocal of the attributable fraction in the exposed (AFe).
In the example of drunk driving and driving related deaths (table - death from speeding or drunk driving), 91% of driving related deaths among drunk drivers could be attributed to drunk driving. We thus have:
This means that, for every 1.1 drunk drivers with a driving related death, one driving related death is attributable to drunk driving on average per year.
This is derived from the population attributable fraction. It is calculated by multiplying the population size (n) by the risk of an event in the next t years (Ipop) and by the population attributable fraction (AFpop) [3].
n = population size
Ipop = incidence in population (over t years)
AFpop = attributable fraction in population
In the example of drunk driving and driving related deaths (table - death from drunk driving), there were 10,000 drivers in the study (n), 18 deaths per 1,000 drivers in one year (Ipop), and 22% of driving related deaths in the population could be attributed to drunk driving (AFpop). We thus have:
This means that up to 40 (of 180) driving related deaths per year in Anystate could potentially be prevented by eliminating drunk driving.
1. Heller RF, Dobson AJ. Disease impact number and population impact number: population perspectives to measures of risk and benefit. Br Med J 2000;321:905-2.2. Heller RF, Dobson AJ, Attia J, Page J. Impact numbers: measures of risk factor impact on the whole population from case-control and cohort studies. J Epidemiol Community Health 2002;56:606-10.3. Heller RF, Buchan I, Edwards R, Lyratzopulos G, McElduff P, St Leger S. Communicating risks at the population level: application of population impact numbers. Br Med J 2003;327:1162-5.
You need to be logged in to post comments.
You can log in here. You can register here if you haven't done so yet.