A set of training materials for professionals working in intervention epidemiology, public health microbiology and infection control and hospital hygiene.
Need help with your investigation or report writing? Ask the Expert. Free advice from the professional community.
You can't make decissions on this page's approval status because you have not the owner or an admin on this page's Group.
So far we have only considered that persons could be either exposed or not, but exposure can frequently be quantified and a gradient established. Examples may include the number of glasses (or volume) of water consumed per day, the number of pizza slices eaten, or the degree of completion of a vaccination course etc. The risk of illness can then be calculated according to amount drunk, eaten or completed.
The Χ2 test for trend across these strata = 23.24, p≤0.001 - indicating that there is a trend across the exposure strata.
If instead a case control study had been conducted (note the similarity between the OR and the RR above):
For which the Χ2 test for trend = 12.77, p≤0.001
In the above examples, the risk of disease occurring increases with the amount of water consumed (i.e. with the dose of water). This is frequently called a dose response or a dose effect relationship.
To compute the risk ratio or the odds ratio the same reference level of exposure is used. Here the non exposed group is used as a reference. Alternatively the group with the lowest incidence could be used.
Dose response is particularly interesting when in an outbreak (often in water borne or a food borne outbreak) everybody is exposed to the same factor but the level of exposure differs among individuals. Choosing the lowest category of exposure as a reference still allows identification of a food item or a beverage as the vehicle for the outbreak. To test that the trend observed in risk or odds ratio differs from no trend, we can use a chi square for trend [1-3]. Dose response is also an important criterion to consider when providing evidence for causality proposed by Bradford Hill .
1. J.J.Schlesselman. Case-control studies: design, conduct, analysis. New York: Oxford University Press; 1982.
2. B.R.Kirkwood, J.A.C.Sterne. Medical Statistics. Second ed. Massachusetts: Blackwell Science Ltd; 2003.
3. K.J.Rothman, S.Greenland, T.L.Lash. Modern Epidemiology. Third ed. Philadelphia, USA: Lipincott Williams and Wilkins; 2008.
4. A.Bradford Hill. The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation? Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine 1965;58:295-300.
You need to be logged in to post comments.
You can log in here. You can register here if you haven't done so yet.