A set of training materials for professionals working in intervention epidemiology, public health microbiology and infection control and hospital hygiene.
Need help with your investigation or report writing? Ask the Expert. Free advice from the professional community.
You can't make decissions on this page's approval status because you have not the owner or an admin on this page's Group.
Jean Claude Desenclos
Start to complete the information table (Table 1), which then provides the supporting evidence underpinning the rapid risk assessment. If there are high-risk groups identified, an information table should be completed for the general population and for each of the groups identified as being at increased risk. This is because the risks are likely to be very different in the various groups. The information table also acts as a template (log record) for recording the evidence and its quality, and documents sources, gaps and uncertainties, which would be an integral part of the assessment process.
Where gaps in knowledge are identified and further information is required, formulate key questions and if possible get expert assessment of your conclusions from the evidence.
If necessary, ask the expert to identify other experts from outside their group they would recommend speaking to (with contact details if possible). The information table should be updated as further information becomes available, ensuring document control.
Join the discussion about this article in the forum!
ikatsi posted on 10/17/2013 10:52:43 AM:
Cohort studies can be useful for rare diseases, too, if they're carried out retrospectively, depending on the attack rate of the disease in the studied population.
You need to be logged in to post comments.
You can log in here. You can register here if you haven't done so yet.